"content clause" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "content clauses",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "content clause (plural content clauses)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Grammar",
          "orig": "en:Grammar",
          "parents": [
            "Linguistics",
            "Language",
            "Social sciences",
            "Communication",
            "Sciences",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "Near-synonyms: nominal clause, noun clause"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2024, Geoffrey K. Pullum, The Truth About English Grammar, Polity Press, →ISBN, page 91:",
          "text": "The bracketed parts [of the examples given] are like main clauses in some ways, but not in every way: that vaccines work would not be allowed as a main clause; nor would I ever saw it. I’ll call them content clauses from now on, because they express full sentence-like content of their own. […] Traditional grammars tend to call content clauses “noun clauses” because of a feeling that content clauses can serve as subjects and objects of verbs, just like nouns (by which they mean NPs [noun phrases]). It’s not a good parallel (verbs like Think and Inquire take content-clause complements but not NP complements), and I won’t be using the term “noun clause” in this book.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A subordinate clause that expresses a full sentence's worth of meaning by itself and often functions like a noun phrase within a main clause (for example, often like a subject or object, but not always)."
      ],
      "id": "en-content_clause-en-noun-d0Eiahrq",
      "links": [
        [
          "grammar",
          "grammar"
        ],
        [
          "subordinate clause",
          "subordinate clause"
        ],
        [
          "noun phrase",
          "noun phrase"
        ],
        [
          "main clause",
          "main clause"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(grammar) A subordinate clause that expresses a full sentence's worth of meaning by itself and often functions like a noun phrase within a main clause (for example, often like a subject or object, but not always)."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "grammar",
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "content clause"
}

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "content clauses",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "content clause (plural content clauses)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English countable nouns",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Grammar"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "Near-synonyms: nominal clause, noun clause"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2024, Geoffrey K. Pullum, The Truth About English Grammar, Polity Press, →ISBN, page 91:",
          "text": "The bracketed parts [of the examples given] are like main clauses in some ways, but not in every way: that vaccines work would not be allowed as a main clause; nor would I ever saw it. I’ll call them content clauses from now on, because they express full sentence-like content of their own. […] Traditional grammars tend to call content clauses “noun clauses” because of a feeling that content clauses can serve as subjects and objects of verbs, just like nouns (by which they mean NPs [noun phrases]). It’s not a good parallel (verbs like Think and Inquire take content-clause complements but not NP complements), and I won’t be using the term “noun clause” in this book.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A subordinate clause that expresses a full sentence's worth of meaning by itself and often functions like a noun phrase within a main clause (for example, often like a subject or object, but not always)."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "grammar",
          "grammar"
        ],
        [
          "subordinate clause",
          "subordinate clause"
        ],
        [
          "noun phrase",
          "noun phrase"
        ],
        [
          "main clause",
          "main clause"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(grammar) A subordinate clause that expresses a full sentence's worth of meaning by itself and often functions like a noun phrase within a main clause (for example, often like a subject or object, but not always)."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "grammar",
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "content clause"
}